Pages

Sunday, October 13, 2019

Here's a Shocking Unemployment Rate Since 1969

https://shope.ee/9KE9iR9D2e



The U.S. economy added an modest 136,000 occupations in September, an gain that helped to bring down the joblessness rate to another five-decade low of 3.5% yet in addition suggested rising alert among managers.


The additional hiring and the drop in the jobless rate will probably simplicity stresses that an economy weakened by the U.S.- China exchange war and more slow global development could be edging toward a potential recession. The government on Friday also revised up its estimated job development in July and August by a combined 45,000.]

Still, a drop-off in the pace of hiring compared with last year points to rising uncertainty among employers about the job market and the economy in the face of President Donald Trump's numerous trade conflicts. Pay growth has also weakened, reflecting the hesitance of employers to step up wages.ate of job growth in July and August by a combined 45,000.

"The September jobs report sent some conflicting signals, but the big picture remains one of a labor market - and an economy - whose growth is downshifting but not collapsing," said Michael Feroli, an economist at JPMorgan Chase.




The comparatively sluggish hiring data makes it likely that the Federal Reserve later this month will cut rates for the third time this year to try to help sustain the expansion. At the same time, the drop in the unemployment rate from 3.7% may embolden some Fed officials who have resisted rate cuts.

Investors appeared pleased that the jobs report at least suggested that the economy remains resilient for now. The Dow Jones Industrial Average was up more than 200 points in mid-day trading.

Excluding government hiring, job gains over the past three months have slowed to an average of 119,000 a month, the weakest showing in seven years.




And despite ultra-low unemployment, average wages dipped in September, the Labor Department said. Hourly pay rose just 2.9% from a year earlier, below the 3.4% year-over-year gain at the start of the year.

Julia Pollak, a labor economist at jobs marketplace ZipRecruiter, said the pay that employers are advertising has declined this year after rising sharply in 2018. And she noted that the number of part-time workers who would prefer full-time work has risen over the past two months.

Those trends "show that employers are increasingly risk-averse as global uncertainty and recession fears rise," Pollak said.



Tom Lix, the CEO and founder of Cleveland Whiskey, which distills bourbon and rye whiskies, said the trade war has shut down markets that his company was developing in Europe and China. This has
forced him to postpone hiring and a planned expansion.

"We were going to build a new building, and add a restaurant and bar, which would have expanded our employment significantly," Lix said.

He had also expected to add three distillers to his staff of 15. But that was before Europe and China imposed retaliatory tariffs on U.S. bourbon - after Trump had raised import taxes on their goods. Europe had accounted for about 15% of Lix's sales before the tariffs took effect.




"All of our European connections and all of our Chinese connections - we're not doing business with them right now," he said.

On Sept. 1, Trump hit $112 billion of Chinese goods with 15% tariffs. He has threatened on Dec. 15 to tax the rest of China's exports to the United States, which would raise prices for U.S. consumers.

The weakest sector of the U.S. economy - manufacturing, which is likely already in recession - cut 2,000 jobs in September. At the same time, retailers shed 11,400 jobs, and employment in mining and logging was unchanged.


The big gains last month were in health care, which added 41,400 jobs, and professional and business services, which include such higher-paying areas as engineering and accounting but also lower-paying temp work. That sector added 34,000 positions.

Friday's jobs data underscored the benefits of a hot job market for lower-paid Americans and traditionally disadvantaged workers. The unemployment rate for workers without high school diplomas fell to 4.8%, the lowest level on records dating to 1992. The rate for Latinos fell to 3.9%, also a record low.

Amy Glaser, senior vice president at Adecco USA, a staffing firm, says companies are still willing to raise pay for blue collar workers. Some are also paying retention and signing bonuses and in some cases double pay for overtime.



"We're still seeing strong demand, we're still seeing more job opportunities out there than candidates," Glaser said.

The employment figures carry more weight than usual because worries about the health of the economy are mounting. A measure of factory activity fell in September to its lowest level in more than a decade, while a similar gauge of the economy's vast services sector slowed sharply in September, falling to its lowest point in three years.

The job market is the economy's main bulwark. As long as hiring is solid enough to keep the unemployment rate from rising, most Americans will likely remain confident enough to spend, offsetting other drags and propelling the economy forward.



But a slump in hiring or a rise in the unemployment rate in coming months could discourage consumers from spending as freely as they otherwise might during the holiday shopping season.

Consumers are still mostly optimistic, and their spending has kept the economy afloat this year. But they may be growing more cautious. Consumer confidence dropped sharply in September, according to the Conference Board, a business research group. And their spending in August slowed.

There are some bright spots. Home sales, for example, have rebounded as mortgage rates have fallen, helped in part by the Fed's two interest rate cuts this year. And Americans are also buying cars at a still-healthy pace. Consumers would typically be reluctant to make such major purchases if they were fearful of a downturn.

Thursday, October 10, 2019

Fox News Poll Shows New High Of 51% Support For Trump Impeachment


Source: flickr

A Fox News survey/poll conducted October 6-8 of registered voters proposed that 51% of Americans need President Trump impeached  and expelled from office. 

The full outcome of the survey also show that 4% need him impeached, yet not removed and 40% contradict impeachment totally.



That 51% statistic is a record high of surveys on Trump impeachment, up 9% from July! 

Are you buying it?






President Trump marked the change in what and how Fox reports "news" these days, ever since he got elected in a few tweets, where he unloaded on the network:





Here's what the results of theFox News poll regarding Trump impeachment over Ukrainegate showed:

Just over half of voters want President Trump impeached and removed from office, according to a Fox News Poll released Wednesday.
A new high of 51 percent wants Trump impeached and removed from office, another 4 percent want him impeached but not removed, and 40 percent oppose impeachment altogether. In July, 42 percent favored impeachment and removal, while 5 percent said impeach but don’t remove him, and 45 percent opposed impeachment. 
Since July, support for impeachment increased among voters of all stripes: up 11 points among Democrats, 5 points among Republicans and 3 among independents. Support also went up among some of Trump’s key constituencies, including white evangelical Christians (+5 points), white men without a college degree (+8), and rural whites (+10).
Among voters in swing counties (where Hillary Clinton and Trump were within 10 points in 2016), support for impeachment increased to 52 percent, up from 42 percent in July.  
A lot has happened since the July Fox poll on impeachment -- namely, the launch of an impeachment inquiry in the House following allegations Trump improperly pressured Ukraine to investigate the Bidens’ dealings in that country. The 9-point increase in support for impeachment since July, however, doesn’t appear to be based solely on the latest allegations. To that point, more Democrats favor impeaching Trump (85 percent) than consider his call with Ukraine’s president an impeachable offense (76 percent). The same holds true among independents: 39 percent favor impeachment, while 30 percent describe the Ukraine call as impeachable.  
The 4-in-10 voters opposing impeachment give a variety of reasons, including: Trump did nothing wrong (21 percent), it is politically motivated (20 percent), and don’t believe allegations (15 percent).  
Approval of Trump’s job performance is down a couple of points to 43 percent, while 55 percent disapprove. Last month, it was 45-54 percent.  Currently, 86 percent of Republicans approve compared to 89 percent in September.



Breitbart said the following about the poll:

A Fox News poll published Wednesday shows a record 51 percent of respondents support the impeachment and removal of President Donald Trump, a nine-point increase from the news network’s most previous survey on July 19th.

The poll shows an additional four percent believe that the president should be impeached yet remain in office, while 40 percent expressed opposition to impeachment in general. Five percent stated they were undecided on the matter.
The poll comes as House Democrats are attempting to move expeditiously with an impeachment inquiry against President Trump over a partisan CIA officer mischaracterization the president’s summer telephone call with the leader of Ukraine in a so-called “whistleblower” complaint. Both the credibility of the so-called “whistleblower” and his complaint have come in question as the officer was revealed as a registered Democrat with a previous “professional relationship” with a Democratic presidential candidate, while his accusations are based on secondhand information.
His chief claim is that President Trump pressured Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to look into allegations of corruption against former Vice President and White House hopeful Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden. Both President Trump and Zelensky have vehemently denied any pressured was applied and the White House released a transcript of their call to illustrate no wrongdoing occurred.

Hillary Clinton to Trump: 'Don't tempt me' into entering the 2020 presidential race



Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on Tuesday took shots back at President Donald Trump after he challenged her about entering the 2020 presidential political decision, saying, "Don't entice me."

"Don't tempt me. Do your job," Clinton said.

The teasing comment is a response to that previous tweet from Trump that stated, "I imagine that Crooked Hillary Clinton should enter the race to try and steal it away from Uber Left Elizabeth Warren."

"Only one condition," he added. "The Crooked one must explain all of her high crimes and misdemeanors including how & why she deleted 33,000 Emails AFTER getting 'C' Subpoena!."

"I'm not running, but I'm going to keep on working and speaking and standing up for what I believe," she said at the time. "I want to be sure that people understand I'm going to keep speaking out. I'm not going anywhere."


Trump's summon of Clinton - whom he has attacked over and over in his role as President - comes as the Democratic presidential primary ramps up alongside a House impeachment inquiry into the President based on his collaborations with foreign leaders.

The inquiry comes from a whistleblower complaint that accusing Trump mishandled his official forces "to solicit interference" from Ukraine in the 2020 election and that the White House found a way to cover it up. Trump has denied any wrongdoing.

The White House released a rough transcript that shows repeatedly pressured Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in July phone call to research or investigate former Vice President Joe Biden, who he could at last face in the 2020 general political election - and his son, Hunter.

IN ARTICLES 4

Last Sunday,CNN revealed that the first whistleblower's lawyer is now presenting a second whistleblower regarding the President's actions.

Clinton even called Trump a "corrupt human tornado." in an interview in CBS News last month.

"I believe that, look there were many funny things that happened in my election that will not happen again. And I'm hoping that both the public and press understand the way Trump plays the game," Clinton said.

Ukraine's President Says 'No Blackmail' in Trump Call


Source: bbc

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has said there was "no blackmail" in a phone call with Donald Trump that is at the heart of a possible attempt to remove the US president from office.

"This is not corruption, it was just a call," Mr Zelensky said on Thursday.

The call lead to a whistleblower complaint and Democratic impeachment inquiry of the Republican president.           




Mr Trump denies retaining US aid while forcing Ukraine to investigate political opponent Joe Biden.


On Thursday, Speaking to reporters at a news meeting in Kiev,Mr Zelensky said of his 25 July call with Mr Trump:  "There was no blackmail. It was not the subject of our conversation." 

He said the reason for the discussion was to organize a meeting with Trump, and there were no "conditions" from the US side. 



An unpleasant transcript of the call discharged by the White House indicates Mr Trump asked Mr Zelensky to research or investigate Joe Biden, presently a Democratic frontrunner for next year's White House election. 

Hunter Biden, His son, handled a rewarding board position in 2014 with a Ukrainian gas firm that wound up under investigation from a previous prosecutor general. 


As US VP Mr Biden, as other Western officials, put pressure on Ukraine in 2016 to have the prosecutor terminated, refering to corruption concerns.


Wednesday, October 9, 2019

Republicans maintain support for Trump while Democrats keep up pressure



On Sunday morning, President Trump defended by the Republicans  in the midst of a developing impeachment inquiry while Democrats kept up the weight on him.

On "Meet the Press," Ron Johnson, a Republican senator from Wisconsin, shows his support for Trump. In response to questions from host Chuck Todd, Johnson constantly centered on the 2016 political election, instead of the present inquiries regarding Trump.




“Something pretty fishy happened in the 2016 campaign ... and we still don’t know,” Johnson said. Todd attempted to guide the discussion back to the circumstances surrounding the impeachment inquiry and become progressively exasperated with Johnson.

A Democratic senator from Connecticut,Chris Murphy said “I’m deeply scared by the positioning the Republicans have chosen to take.”

“I think public opinion will change” about Trump. He added that as the inquiry proceeds

Murphy likewise said that he figures numerous Republicans will stay stalwart behind Trump.

“It’s true, the president could shoot someone in the middle of fifth Avenue, and Republicans won’t care.”




The administration endured seven days of damaging developments that included Trump openly approaching Ukraine and China to research previous VP Joe Biden and his son — agreeing Democrats' allegation that the president was utilizing his power to focus on a political rival.

Representative Hakeem Jeffries of New York, who is part of the House Democratic leadership said on ABC’s “This Week.” “The evidence of wrongdoing by Donald Trump is hiding in plain sight,” “The president’s own words in the public domain has indicated that he doesn’t think there’s any problem in soliciting foreign interference.”



Trump asserts that Biden inappropriately helped his son Hunter benefit from business deals in Ukraine and China. The allegations identified with Ukraine have been discredited, and those identified with China aren't bolstered by publicly known informations. Biden's 2020 presidential campaign has dismissed the claims as without merit.

One of Trump's staunchest Republican partners, Representative Jim Jordan of Ohio, declined on Sunday to safeguard Trump's recommendation, make to media outside the White House, that China look into the Bidens. The president wasn't being not serious, Jordan said.

White House Declares War on Impeachment Inquiry



The White House announced war on the House Impeachment Inquiry on Tuesday, they have announced that it would not participate with what it called an illegitimate and partisan effort “to overturn the results of the 2016 election” of Donald J. Trump. In a letter to House Democratic leaders , the White House said the inquiry violated point of reference and President Trump's due process rights in such an intolerable way, that neither he nor the executive branch would willingly present testimonies or documents, a challenging move that makes way for a constitutional conflict.


“Your unprecedented actions have left the president with no choice,” said the eight-page letter signed by Pat A. Cipollone, the White House counsel. “In order to fulfill his duties to the American people, the Constitution, the Executive Branch, and all future occupants of the Office of the presidency, President Trump and his administration cannot participate in your partisan and unconstitutional inquiry under these circumstances.”


The letter came shortly after the White House hindered the meeting of a key witness, Gordon D. Sondland, the United States ambassador to the European Union, only hours before he was to show up on Capitol Hill. A senior administration official said no documents would be given neither present other witnesses, putting a "full end" to cooperation. The president's choice to oppose no matter how you look at it is itself a possibly point of reference setting move that could have far-reaching implications for the inquiry. Democrats knew that it supports their rundown of impeachable offenses, adding the stonewalling of Congress to the count, however it could likewise deprive them of crutial witnesses and proofs they may need to stop sound charges against the president.

It came after days of perplexity, vulnerability and discussion inside the White House and among Mr. Trump's partners about his system as investigators delve into his efforts to pressure Ukraine to give damaging data or information about his domestic opponents. Just a week ago, Mr. Trump openly promised to take an interest in the inquiry , saying that, “I always cooperate” and that “we’ll work together” with Democrats despite the fact that he believed the claims against him to be meritless.






He turned around himself after investigators were given instant messages that raised doubt about his assertion that there was no quid pro quo when he squeezed Ukraine's leader to investigation Democrats while dangling a White House invitation and retaining American security assistance. The choice to stop Mr. Sondland's testimony disappointed some House Republicans. Few of them visited the president before Tuesday and disclosed why they hoped to get testimony from Mr. Sondland, an individual informed on the meeting stated, in part since he has just denied any quid pro quo.

Monday, October 7, 2019

The latest on the Trump Impeachment Inquiry



House Democrats extended their prosecution investigation or impeachment inquiry into President Trump today.

They subpoenaed the Pentagon and Office of Management and Budget regarding the decision to hold up foreign aid to Ukraine. They are requesting the organizations turn over records by Oct. 15.

In case you're just tuning in, this is what else you have to know today:




  • Request proceeds: Democrats have mentioned data from three Rudy Giuliani partners — Lev Parnas, a Ukrainian-American representative who worked with Giuliani; Igor Fruman, a colleague of Parnas; and Semyon "Sam" Kislin, a former aide to Giuliani. Lawmakers are also warning they will subpoena the associates if they do not comply with their requests for documents and depositions.



  • Whistleblower protection: The House Intelligence Committee and attorneys for the whistleblower who filed a complaint about Trump's direct are talking about extraordinary measures to ensure the individual's identity in the midst of developing worries about their wellbeing, as per a few sources acquainted with the procedure. Among the measures being discussed are the plausibility of utilizing an off-site area, restricting Hill staff and individuals who might be present and even disguising the individual's image and voice, the sources said.


  • Rick Perry: The Energy Secretary said he "absolutely" asked Trump "multiple times" to call Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, yet about vitality — not previous Vice President Joe Biden and his son1, Hunter. Perry's representative likewise affirmed that he was not on Trump's July 25 telephone call with Zelensky.

  • The second whistleblower: Trump told correspondents today he is "not at all" worried about a second whistleblower. The lawyer for the first intelligence whistleblower who approached with allegations concerning Trump and his connections with Ukraine said he and other lawyers in his group are currently speaking to the econd whistleblower, who the lawyer said works in the intelligence community, has direct information that supports cases made by the first whistleblower and has addressed the intelligence community's inspector general.

Can Donald Trump possibly win 45 states in 2020?




At a gathering of White House ranking staff a week ago, acting White House head of staff Mick Mulvaney made a strong prediction: If the House indicts Donald Trump, he will win 45 states in his 2020 re-election race.

Which is some sort of prediction!, would it be able to, you know, really happen?


All things considered, start here: In 2016, Trump won 30 states just as Maine's second congressional district. (Maine allots a portion of its appointive votes by House situate.) Meaning he expected to get 14 or 15 more in order to make Mulvaney look like a genius.



That will be VERY hard, for a couple of reasons.

1) Trump won six states - Florida, Iowa, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin - that Barack Obama had won in 2012. A few of those states (Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin most strikingly) had not gone for the Republican presidential chosen one of every 10 years or more.


2) Of the 10 closest states - by rate - in 2016, Trump won six of them.

Join those two actualities and you get this current: Trump's 2016 map was really near his top end. As in, there's not a mess of evident pickup states for Trump in 2020 - regardless of whether you expect he can hold the 30 he won in 2016.


The undeniable ones are the four nearest states in 2016 that Hillary Clinton won: New Hampshire, Minnesota, Nevada and Maine. In any case, regardless of whether you give Trump those four, he's just at 34 absolute states in 2020 - 11 short of Mulvaney's prediction. Give Trump the three different states Clinton beat him by single digits (Colorado, New Mexico and Virginia) despite everything he needs eight additional states.

All over at that point, Mulvaney's case is ridiculous. For Trump to win 45 states (or even 40 states) you would require a vigorously tilted national playing field in the occupant's support. Also, if there are any indications of a titled playing field now in the political decision, they're against Trump, not for him.



Thursday, September 13, 2018

Cute Dog Helps Mom Change Baby’s Diaper





The Lord works in mysterious ways. That much is established. While we may not see his work with our own eyes, if we do not look for Him, we will see Him. Many moms and dads are very stressed while looking after a baby and would love a helping hand. The Lord listens to those who ask for help. This mom has a special friend to help her change her baby’s diapers.


Have you ever changed a baby’s diaper? Doesn’t seem too difficult, does it? Now imagine doing it 24/7 for many months after your baby is born. Day and night at irregular hours. See the challenge now? Many parents would love to hire a nanny to take care of their wee one, but it is rarely possible to afford such a luxury.

A mum has trained her beagle by the name of Charlie to assist in the business of changing her baby’s diapers. Not only does he help change diapers, but he also brings a high five to the table.




Charlie’s duties include bringing the diaper bag when needed, bringing the towel, as well as picking out the baby powder. When the diaper has been changed Charlie takes the dirty diaper and puts it into the bin. He ends his service with a quick kiss to the cheek. Try your hand at training your furry friend. Who knows? Help does come from unexpected places.




Like and share your thoughts below. Don't forget to like our page and more interesting stories.



Archaeologists unearth site of Jesus’ ‘water into wine’ miracle








The Gospel of John famously recounts the story of Jesus Christ turning water into wine during the Wedding at Cana.

In the account, Jesus, his mother Mary and his disciples are invited to a wedding, and when the wine runs out, Jesus delivers a sign of his glory by turning water into wine.

For hundreds of years, some believed the miracle site to be Kafr Kanna, a town in northern Israel near the Sea of Galilee.


But in a bombshell development, archaeologists now believe the Cana of biblical times to actually be a dusty hillside five miles further north.

A number of compelling clues suggest the site is actually Khirbet Qana, a Jewish village which existed between the years of 323 BC and AD 324.


Excavations have revealed a network of tunnels used for Christian worship, marked with crosses and references to Kyrie Iesou, a Greek phrase meaning Lord Jesus.

There was also an altar and a shelf with the remains of a stone vessel, plus room for five more.


Six stone jars like this held the wine in the biblical account of the miracle.

Dr Tom McCollough, who is directing excavations at the site, said there were three other sites with a credible claim to being the Cana of scripture.



“But none has the ensemble of evidence that makes such a persuasive case for Khirbet Qana,” he said.

“We have uncovered a large Christian veneration cave complex that was used by Christian pilgrims who came to venerate the water-to-wine miracle.




“This complex was used at the beginning of the late fifth or early 6th Century and continued to be used by pilgrims into the 12th Century Crusader period.

“The pilgrim texts we have from this period that describe what pilgrims did and saw when they came to Cana of Galilee match very closely what we have exposed as the veneration complex.”

As part of his evidence, Dr McCollough points to the work of first-century Jewish historian Flavius Josephus.

He said: “His references to Cana align geographically with the location of Khirbet Qana and align logically with his movements.



“The reference to Cana in Josephus, the New Testament and in the rabbinic texts would argue the village was a Jewish village, near the Sea of Galilee and in the region of lower Galilee.

“Khirbet Qana fulfills all of these criteria.”

As for the better-known site at Kafr Kanna, Dr McCollough is sceptical.

“When tourists visiting Israel today are taken to Cana, they are taken to Kafr Kanna,” he said.

“However, this site was not recognized as a pilgrimage site for those seeking Cana until the 1700s.

“At this point the Franciscans were managing Christian pilgrimage and facilitating easy passage rather than historical accuracy.”

Dr McCollough believes the discoveries at Khirbet Qana could even bolster the case for the historicity of the Gospel of John.






He said: “Our excavations have shown that this was in fact a thriving Jewish village located in the heart of much of Jesus’ life and ministry.

“For the Gospel of John, Cana is in some ways, Jesus’ safe place or operational centre. It is a place he and his disciples return to when they encounter resistance in Judea.

“I would argue our excavations warrant at least a reconsideration of the historical value of John’s references to Cana and Jesus.”




Like and share your thoughts below. Don't forget to like our page and more interesting stories.